curiouswombat: (suitable job for a lady)
My friend [livejournal.com profile] lindahoyland posted a link on her journal to this article about fanfic.

It is interesting in a number of ways; the writer clearly enjoys reading fic, understands the 'why' of so much of it - I started reading fan fiction because I wanted to read more about characters I already knew, and gives an interesting history of fanfic.

But... she is clearly one of the lurkers - not really involved with the feeling of fandom as a community, I think, so there is little sense of that existing. And she mainly discusses FF.Net (aka The Pit of Voles, around here) and AO3, rather than the more fandom specific archives. And so she quotes a piece of research that concluded that the average user of FanFiction.Net in 2010 was a 15.8-year-old girl from the United States who didn’t write fan fiction herself. Not to say that 45-year-old mothers and adolescent boys don’t also read it, or that fan fiction is only written in English; but the odds are not good. ...the community is 80 per cent teenage and 80 per cent female.

We've seen this before - quite a few of us think it is probably not a true picture of fanfic at all - and the person who wrote the article should have really thought about it when she quoted it - as she also pointed out that from her first forays in the Pit of Voles she lied about her age and always ticked to say that she was over 18... I mentioned on Linda's journal that I have a feeling that quite a lot of the over 40s probably knock a few years off, as well... Linda agreed that she did, just because she got fed up being asked her age.

So logic suggests that any measure of age should tend towards a modal age in the early 20s really - not one of under 16!

Still; an interesting article, I think.
curiouswombat: (Anya)
That 100 Book meme that's around again at the moment? I was curious about the make-up of the list, and when the BBC might have published it. Now I almost hate to tell you all this - but actually the BBC neither wrote the list, nor said you were likely to only have read 6 books from it.

The original BBC list of 100 books was actually to do with people's favourite books and was drawn up as part of The Big Read, 10 years ago - here it is.

But you will notice that it isn't exactly the same as the one currently doing the rounds of Facebook and now here - the BBC list is actually even more Brit-centric.

There is an article here looking at a way in which the BBC list might have been changed to become that meme... And another article here which points out that the list bears more resemblance to the Guardian's list, posted in 2007, showing the result of a poll of 2,000 people for World Book Day - which I think it does.

But again, the Guardian writers make no suggestion that people will only have read 6.

So - it is an interesting list of books which seems to be ever-changing (which is true of many of these memes), isn't from the BBC, and no-one ever suggested you are better than average if you've read more than 6... Sorry.

However the meme is still interesting in it's own right, of course!

** The Truth is, of course, also the title of a book by Terry Pratchett - some of whose works are in the original, BBC, list - but not in the meme.

January 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
56 7891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 10 Jun 2025 10:21 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios