curiouswombat: (Grandma infinitemonkeys)
[personal profile] curiouswombat
I have chased the cat off the key-board – much to his disgust – and am posting some pictures of our holiday in London.

We didn’t take any pictures of our hotel, or our shopping trips, or even the National Portrait Gallery, which is one of my favourite places in London, and now also Daughter-dear’s as well.

The hotel was very good, two minutes from Kensington High Street tube station, in a cul-de-sac – and we got a good price on the internet – if anyone ever needs the details, just ask!

My daughter is, of course, really into history, and so on our trip we visited a number of historical sites, and spent a good length of time at them, rather than dashing through! So most of our pictures are of ‘history’!



Actually I lied about there being no shopping pictures – we visited Covent Garden, and I took a couple of pictures of the roof – so here is a picture of one of the shopping halls at Covent Garden.



We visited both The Tower and Hampton Court – but tonight I am only putting the Tower pictures on my journal.

Because it was Easter week and therefore school holidays we found that at the Royal Palaces there were people doing re-enactments – an added bonus!

So these pictures show some of the re-enactment of the Theft of the Crown Jewels by Colonel Blood in 1671.

This is Talbot Edwards, Deputy Keeper of the Crown Jewels, and his daughter. (The aristocratic ‘Keeper’ lived somewhere else, and employed Edwards to do the job.)




Colonel Blood, disguised as a parson, befriended Edwards, with the promise of his well to do nephew as a suitor for Miss Edwards. The ‘nephew’ was actually his son, a petty thief, and on the day of the attempted theft Blood, his son, and his brother-in-law Hunt rendered Edwards unconscious and attempted to escape with the jewels – here is Blood junior -




And here are the three thieves making their getaway –




They were of course apprehended, in the first instance by Edwards’ son who arrived at The Tower unexpectedly, and the jewels were recovered.

(If you want to read the story, try here - http://www.historic-uk.com/HistoryUK/England-History/ColonelBlood.htm )

You aren’t allowed to take pictures of the Crown Jewels – but they are stunning – both of us were actually most impressed, funnily enough, by a gold punch bowl the size of a bath covered with gold lobsters, barnacles etc!


However you are allowed to take pictures in the Royal Armoury – and I managed to take a few fairly good ones, despite the lowish light level – this first one is armour made for Henry 8th when he was first married to Katherine of Aragon – it is engraved with what are basically’ Henry+Katherine4Eva’ motifs!! I love the metal 'pleated skirt'!



And I think that this is the one made for Henry’s brother Arthur when he was Prince of Wales which is engraved with scenes from the life of Alexander the Great!



We didn’t see the ravens – they were staying in their little Raven-barracks!

We did get a good view of the now-famous ‘Gherkin’ building though –



And I took a picture of this ancient Chinese Cannon, because it reminded me of the Discworld -




Although people say how expensive the entrance fees are we thought it was well worth it - £15 for me, and £13 for D-d, as a student – you would pay more for a theme park, and our visit kept us occupied for six hours. And the food was very good, and not at all expensive by London standards – we were quite impressed!

And as we came away from the tower, I took the almost compulsory picture of Tower Bridge -







Later this week I’ll put some more of the pics up – and a couple of pictures of historical monuments that only a real history buff would make pilgrimages to!

Date: 19/04/2006 09:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] authoressnebula.livejournal.com
That's so neat! I loved the pictures. Thanks for sharing them sweetie!

That canon is simply awesome. WOW.

~Nebula

Date: 19/04/2006 10:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] curiouswombat.livejournal.com
I know - I loved that cannon!
(deleted comment)

Date: 19/04/2006 10:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] curiouswombat.livejournal.com
I thought it was a bit of a shame that so much of the armour has moved to the new Armoury in Leeds - I remember seeing elephant armour when I visited a good few years ago!

Date: 19/04/2006 09:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fenchurche.livejournal.com
Wonderful photos!! And I'm taking notes for our trip to England later this year!

Date: 19/04/2006 10:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] curiouswombat.livejournal.com
Ah - wait until you see the pictures of Hampton Court - less internationally famous, but an absolutely wonderful day out. And Covent Garden shops are gorgeous - small, eclectic, and some of them fairly cheap!

Date: 19/04/2006 09:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gamiila.livejournal.com
Lovely pictures! I really must get to the Tower next time I'm in London...

Date: 19/04/2006 10:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] curiouswombat.livejournal.com
It is worth giving proper time to - an hour or two hour visit would mean missing bits, and then thinking it isn't worth the money.

Date: 19/04/2006 10:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bojojoti.livejournal.com
Thanks for a lovely travelogue! I have a fascination of history; I enjoyed your link and photos.

Looking forward to more.

Date: 19/04/2006 10:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] curiouswombat.livejournal.com
I have a fascination of history
Ah - well you might understand why we made a pilgrimage to Broad Street to see the site of the pump! If the relevance of the Broad Street Pump is not taught in your part of the world, I will explain all later!

Date: 20/04/2006 12:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bojojoti.livejournal.com
No, it isn't taught here. It seems I escaped my schooling with very little history taught or learned. Thankfully, I have a curious (why do I think "wombat" after that word?) mind, and I've never let the end of my school days end my education. I "googled" Broad Street pump and read an interesting synopsis, but I look forward to hearing from you.

Date: 19/04/2006 10:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] petzipellepingo.livejournal.com
Very nice photos. They have been running a BBC series about the Tower on the History Channel and it, like your snaps, made me recall my visit there. I actually liked the Scottish crown jewels better, the British ones are just too big and gaudy for my tastes. The Tower series told me the other day that the notice marking the site of the deaths of Anne Boleyn, etc. is in the wrong spot, they were actually executed where the parade ground is. The Victorians used an execution in the 1700s as the model spot for all the executions but contemporary accounts show they were wrong.
It's such a fascinating place to visit. I really enjoyed London.

Date: 19/04/2006 10:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] curiouswombat.livejournal.com
the British ones are just too big and gaudy for my tastes.

There was actually a fascinating exhibition of 'ex Crown Jewels' - which I didn't think would photograph very well. It was the various crowns made for various kings and queens, from which the jewels had been removed to put them into other crowns as fashions changed - and actually when reduced to just goldwork and velvet I thought some of them were prettier than the ones with the jewels actually in them at the moment.

Date: 19/04/2006 10:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bogwitch.livejournal.com
I haven't been to the Tower in years, and it's even longer since I saw the Crown Jewels (so long I don't even remember them). Makes me want to go again!

Date: 19/04/2006 10:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] curiouswombat.livejournal.com
£15 - but not bad value, I think! It was quite busy when we were there - but they have a system of marshalling you through a series of information areas on your way to the actual Jewels, so you don't feel as if you are queueing, more proceeding!

Date: 19/04/2006 10:30 pm (UTC)
quinara: Sheep on a hillside with a smiley face. (Andrew English)
From: [personal profile] quinara
London! Love the place, and your pictures are wonderful. :D

Date: 19/04/2006 10:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] curiouswombat.livejournal.com
I like it as a place to visit - about every ten years or so!

Thank you for the compliment on the photography! Completely unrelated to your comment - but the more I look at The Gherkin the more it looks like a giant glass dildo...!!

Date: 20/04/2006 11:06 am (UTC)
quinara: Sheep on a hillside with a smiley face. (Default)
From: [personal profile] quinara
Hee! It's pretty ugly, whatever it is.

Date: 19/04/2006 11:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zanthinegirl.livejournal.com
That's very cool! Mt mother and I have been talking about going to London next fall-- it depends on the timing of my dad's annual elk hunting trip-- and the tower would be a top destination!

Your description of Henry VIII armor makes me snicker! That cannon is very cool though-- I see what you mean about disk-world!

Date: 20/04/2006 07:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] curiouswombat.livejournal.com
Thanks. The Tower is well worth the visit - it is more a small village than a single entity, with people living in many of the houses along the walls etc. - the reason there is a 'Do not Enter' sign in the picture is because that is the steps to someone's front door.

And the cannon was just SO Discworld!

Date: 20/04/2006 08:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zanthinegirl.livejournal.com
I'm a relatively recent convert to Discworld; due in a large part to comments from S2C. It's sad; I'm eve more cynical than usual!

Date: 20/04/2006 12:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wisemack.livejournal.com
Ooooooooo! Lovely pix, hon - looks like yáll had a grand time

Dang, I really must go back to London some day and see all the stuff I missed the first two times. (Which is basically everything *I* wanted to see. Comes of traveling with other folks who don't have huge history-laden obsessive agendas.)

I did spend lots of time in Leeds, however, and yes, the Royal Armouries are definitely worth a visit! For a Highlander fan, the swords alone were a revelation! LOL!

Date: 20/04/2006 07:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] curiouswombat.livejournal.com
Thank you. It must be very difficult to do London with people who aren't into history - it would be nothing but shops!

Some of those claymores are great, and you'd need to bo pretty tall to handle some of the two-handed swords.

Date: 20/04/2006 02:07 am (UTC)
jerusha: (Default)
From: [personal profile] jerusha
Wow! Those are great pictures! Thanks so much for posting them!

Date: 20/04/2006 07:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] curiouswombat.livejournal.com
Thank you - I enjoy the sharing.

Date: 20/04/2006 05:57 am (UTC)
ext_11988: made by lmbossy (Default)
From: [identity profile] kazzy-cee.livejournal.com
The first time I saw Henry VIII's armour I was so surprised how tall he was. Very unusual for that period to be around 6' tall.

London does great tourist stuff!! LOL! It's great unless you work up there which I did for many years - then you hate the tourists!

Date: 20/04/2006 07:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] curiouswombat.livejournal.com
I was also impressed by how tall Henry was. A guide in Hampton Court tried to tell us that many men were a good six-foot at the time, but I don't believe him!

I think of London as a place to visit - rarely!

Date: 20/04/2006 10:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hesadevilspike.livejournal.com
I think of London as a place to visit - rarely!

Me too. It's a place for young people. The Daughter was born in South London and, despite moving to the wilds of Hertfordshire when she was 8, she considers herself a Londoner and has never left it since leaving home to go to Imperial College.

Love the obligatory pic of Tower Bridge. The poor Yanks thought they were getting that when we sold them Tower Bridge. Have you ever seen Tower Bridge in action? When I took my German nephew-in-law on 'the tour' many years ago, he got a photo of a sailing ship passing beneath the opening bridge.

Date: 20/04/2006 12:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] curiouswombat.livejournal.com
No, I've never seen it open in real life, only on TV!

I really, really wouldn't want to live in London - and my daughter agrees, at least at the moment, even though she's got a couple of friends who are desperate to move there.

Date: 20/04/2006 12:48 pm (UTC)
gillo: (castle)
From: [personal profile] gillo
It's good to see you back home safe and sound. Splendid pics - the cannon is superb and I like the dress-up folks. Did they have some at Hampton Court too? They did last time we were there. We used to live very close to Hampton, so Frances knew all about "the king with all those wives" by the time she was four!

It's so easy to overlook all the "touristy" things, isn't it? Only last year we realised we'd not taken the girls to the British Museum since we were using buggies to transport them, so we went on a trip. They fell in love with the place.

Date: 20/04/2006 06:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] curiouswombat.livejournal.com
They had the visit of Henry 8th to Cardinal Wolsey happening at Hampton Court, but actually I didn't take any pictures of them, beautiful though Katherine and Anne Boleyn's clothes were - there was not a good shot!

Actually in the end we didn't make it to the British Museum - I know, sacrilage!

Date: 21/04/2006 12:47 am (UTC)
gillo: (doublet)
From: [personal profile] gillo
Heck, there's only so much you can do. I love Hampton Court Palace, though. It was a great joy to drive past it so often in the old days.

Date: 20/04/2006 02:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] spikereader.livejournal.com
Lovely pictures - Bethan enjoyed them too, especially Henry's armour. She's fascinated by London, and has been wanting to visit for the last couple of summers for her birthday. Maybe we'll make it this year - when you think that it takes less than an hour for use to get there on the train, we should make the effort.

Date: 20/04/2006 06:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] curiouswombat.livejournal.com
The armour is very accessible - I'm sure she'd enjoy it. The Jewels are lovely to look at as well - but as there is a moving walkway past the actual crowns you have an exact amount of time in which to see the star ones. It must have been a very early moving walk-way - I remember it from twenty years ago. I have a few more armour pictures.... although I think that ws the only one with full horse armour that I photographed.

Date: 20/04/2006 04:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ozma914.livejournal.com
Those are, as they say where I come from, *so cool*.

Date: 20/04/2006 06:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] curiouswombat.livejournal.com
Thank you - I'll do some more soon - Hampton Court is particularly photogenic!

Date: 20/04/2006 08:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ozma914.livejournal.com
Photogenic is always a good thing!

Date: 20/04/2006 04:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ayinhara.livejournal.com
Many thanks for the pictures. I am a big fan of London. It has all sorts of photo ops.

Date: 20/04/2006 06:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] curiouswombat.livejournal.com
Thank you. Of course the main problem with trying to take pictures in London is that it is so full of people!

Date: 20/04/2006 05:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] averageshmoe.livejournal.com
Hi,

Delighted to see that you enjoyed your trip and are now safely home. From reading his posts I had the feeling that S2C was rattling around the home front.

Hate to say this but I had the WTF moment when I saw that glass tower thing and it was only magnified when I saw the name. Did London decide that it just had to have a more phallic building than Paris?

By the way, did you see that Xander the Wombat has gone missing? A fan (obviously) in Oregon reported the disappearance this week. Willow the Wombat . . . along with Ethel the Aardvark remained safely at home.

I'm joking about Ethel, it just seemed so natural to mention her there. Now if I could get the picture of Juliet Landau having tea with an aardvark out of my head I'd be a happy man.

Although I bet either you or S2C could write a ficlet about that and it would make sense.

I saw a post over at Whedonesque where the actress who played the much maligned, perhaps unfairly so, Kennedy has come out of the closet. Apparently her love scenes with AH got her wondering about her sexuality.

Can't you just see Hannigan reading this and saying "Damn, I'm good."

Is the Hugh Laurie show 'House' showing where you're at? Michelle T. was just a guest star on a recent episode and did a very convincing job of playing a . . . whiny, resentful sixteen year old who managed to get in a life threatening situation. And it aired on Tuesday night no less. Sad to say it was her most convincing performance I've seen in a while. Missed her theatrical movies but saw her in a made for tv thing where she was trying to play a twenty something who abandons the fiance she no longer loves after he is crippled. The character was uninteresting and love scenes with her and an older actor were kinda creepy. She's over twenty but really hasn't changed all that much.

Take care and enjoy settling in. I'd wish you a nice cup of tea but I'm afraid I share Colin Mochrie's attitude toward the drink.

pgavigan

Date: 20/04/2006 05:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] curiouswombat.livejournal.com
The Gherkin is actually officially the Swiss Re Tower, 30 St Mary Axe, London. But everyone calls it The Gherkin - probably encouraged by the powers that be because having a building known to all and sundry as The London Dildo would be a bit embarrassing!

We do have House - I find it a bit difficult to take Hugh Laurie seriously, having sat through innumerable series of Blackadder when our daughter discovered it! I have seen some episodes, but not the MT one - I think we might be a series, or half a series or something, behind the US here though, so I'll look out for it anyway.

I'm not big on tea myself - although we did have afternoon tea at Selfridges whilst in London.

Date: 21/04/2006 07:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vegmb.livejournal.com
Thank you so much for sharing these. I love the historical pics, and the re-enactment was great. (And the cannon!)

Date: 08/05/2007 05:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] beanbeans.livejournal.com
Oh, excellent pics, CW. Indeed, we were in awe at the size of, and odd decorations upon, that punchbowl, as well as that enormous gold platter that could easily have served a small army!

The armor is quite impressive. I cannot imagine keeping oneself astride a galloping horse when wearing that much heavy metal. Oof. It's no wonder they were such strong men.

I took a pic of that cannon, and of the Roman wall behind it as well. It's really something to see such ancient items out in the open air; one worries that they will be irreparably damaged over time.

Thanks so much for pointing me at your wonderful pics. :)

Date: 08/05/2007 05:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] curiouswombat.livejournal.com
Thank you - and wasn't that punch bowl amazing?

one worries that they will be irreparably damaged over time.
Wouldn't worry about them too much - they've survived pretty well so far, and will be taken good care of. Hadrian's wall is still looking pretty good and it's almost 2,000 years old! Actually I have some good pictures of Hadrian's wall - I must post them sometime.

If you want to see the rest of the pics we took in London, they are all tagged as 'London'.

January 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
56 7891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 13 Jun 2025 04:57 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios