Trip to London.
19 Apr 2006 10:27 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I have chased the cat off the key-board – much to his disgust – and am posting some pictures of our holiday in London.
We didn’t take any pictures of our hotel, or our shopping trips, or even the National Portrait Gallery, which is one of my favourite places in London, and now also Daughter-dear’s as well.
The hotel was very good, two minutes from Kensington High Street tube station, in a cul-de-sac – and we got a good price on the internet – if anyone ever needs the details, just ask!
My daughter is, of course, really into history, and so on our trip we visited a number of historical sites, and spent a good length of time at them, rather than dashing through! So most of our pictures are of ‘history’!
Actually I lied about there being no shopping pictures – we visited Covent Garden, and I took a couple of pictures of the roof – so here is a picture of one of the shopping halls at Covent Garden.

We visited both The Tower and Hampton Court – but tonight I am only putting the Tower pictures on my journal.
Because it was Easter week and therefore school holidays we found that at the Royal Palaces there were people doing re-enactments – an added bonus!
So these pictures show some of the re-enactment of the Theft of the Crown Jewels by Colonel Blood in 1671.
This is Talbot Edwards, Deputy Keeper of the Crown Jewels, and his daughter. (The aristocratic ‘Keeper’ lived somewhere else, and employed Edwards to do the job.)

Colonel Blood, disguised as a parson, befriended Edwards, with the promise of his well to do nephew as a suitor for Miss Edwards. The ‘nephew’ was actually his son, a petty thief, and on the day of the attempted theft Blood, his son, and his brother-in-law Hunt rendered Edwards unconscious and attempted to escape with the jewels – here is Blood junior -

And here are the three thieves making their getaway –

They were of course apprehended, in the first instance by Edwards’ son who arrived at The Tower unexpectedly, and the jewels were recovered.
(If you want to read the story, try here - http://www.historic-uk.com/HistoryUK/England-History/ColonelBlood.htm )
You aren’t allowed to take pictures of the Crown Jewels – but they are stunning – both of us were actually most impressed, funnily enough, by a gold punch bowl the size of a bath covered with gold lobsters, barnacles etc!
However you are allowed to take pictures in the Royal Armoury – and I managed to take a few fairly good ones, despite the lowish light level – this first one is armour made for Henry 8th when he was first married to Katherine of Aragon – it is engraved with what are basically’ Henry+Katherine4Eva’ motifs!! I love the metal 'pleated skirt'!

And I think that this is the one made for Henry’s brother Arthur when he was Prince of Wales which is engraved with scenes from the life of Alexander the Great!

We didn’t see the ravens – they were staying in their little Raven-barracks!
We did get a good view of the now-famous ‘Gherkin’ building though –

And I took a picture of this ancient Chinese Cannon, because it reminded me of the Discworld -

Although people say how expensive the entrance fees are we thought it was well worth it - £15 for me, and £13 for D-d, as a student – you would pay more for a theme park, and our visit kept us occupied for six hours. And the food was very good, and not at all expensive by London standards – we were quite impressed!
And as we came away from the tower, I took the almost compulsory picture of Tower Bridge -

Later this week I’ll put some more of the pics up – and a couple of pictures of historical monuments that only a real history buff would make pilgrimages to!
We didn’t take any pictures of our hotel, or our shopping trips, or even the National Portrait Gallery, which is one of my favourite places in London, and now also Daughter-dear’s as well.
The hotel was very good, two minutes from Kensington High Street tube station, in a cul-de-sac – and we got a good price on the internet – if anyone ever needs the details, just ask!
My daughter is, of course, really into history, and so on our trip we visited a number of historical sites, and spent a good length of time at them, rather than dashing through! So most of our pictures are of ‘history’!
Actually I lied about there being no shopping pictures – we visited Covent Garden, and I took a couple of pictures of the roof – so here is a picture of one of the shopping halls at Covent Garden.

We visited both The Tower and Hampton Court – but tonight I am only putting the Tower pictures on my journal.
Because it was Easter week and therefore school holidays we found that at the Royal Palaces there were people doing re-enactments – an added bonus!
So these pictures show some of the re-enactment of the Theft of the Crown Jewels by Colonel Blood in 1671.
This is Talbot Edwards, Deputy Keeper of the Crown Jewels, and his daughter. (The aristocratic ‘Keeper’ lived somewhere else, and employed Edwards to do the job.)

Colonel Blood, disguised as a parson, befriended Edwards, with the promise of his well to do nephew as a suitor for Miss Edwards. The ‘nephew’ was actually his son, a petty thief, and on the day of the attempted theft Blood, his son, and his brother-in-law Hunt rendered Edwards unconscious and attempted to escape with the jewels – here is Blood junior -

And here are the three thieves making their getaway –

They were of course apprehended, in the first instance by Edwards’ son who arrived at The Tower unexpectedly, and the jewels were recovered.
(If you want to read the story, try here - http://www.historic-uk.com/HistoryUK/England-History/ColonelBlood.htm )
You aren’t allowed to take pictures of the Crown Jewels – but they are stunning – both of us were actually most impressed, funnily enough, by a gold punch bowl the size of a bath covered with gold lobsters, barnacles etc!
However you are allowed to take pictures in the Royal Armoury – and I managed to take a few fairly good ones, despite the lowish light level – this first one is armour made for Henry 8th when he was first married to Katherine of Aragon – it is engraved with what are basically’ Henry+Katherine4Eva’ motifs!! I love the metal 'pleated skirt'!

And I think that this is the one made for Henry’s brother Arthur when he was Prince of Wales which is engraved with scenes from the life of Alexander the Great!

We didn’t see the ravens – they were staying in their little Raven-barracks!
We did get a good view of the now-famous ‘Gherkin’ building though –

And I took a picture of this ancient Chinese Cannon, because it reminded me of the Discworld -

Although people say how expensive the entrance fees are we thought it was well worth it - £15 for me, and £13 for D-d, as a student – you would pay more for a theme park, and our visit kept us occupied for six hours. And the food was very good, and not at all expensive by London standards – we were quite impressed!
And as we came away from the tower, I took the almost compulsory picture of Tower Bridge -

Later this week I’ll put some more of the pics up – and a couple of pictures of historical monuments that only a real history buff would make pilgrimages to!
no subject
Date: 19/04/2006 09:41 pm (UTC)That canon is simply awesome. WOW.
~Nebula
no subject
Date: 19/04/2006 10:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 19/04/2006 10:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 19/04/2006 09:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 19/04/2006 10:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 19/04/2006 09:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 19/04/2006 10:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 19/04/2006 10:07 pm (UTC)Looking forward to more.
no subject
Date: 19/04/2006 10:19 pm (UTC)Ah - well you might understand why we made a pilgrimage to Broad Street to see the site of the pump! If the relevance of the Broad Street Pump is not taught in your part of the world, I will explain all later!
no subject
Date: 20/04/2006 12:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 19/04/2006 10:23 pm (UTC)It's such a fascinating place to visit. I really enjoyed London.
no subject
Date: 19/04/2006 10:34 pm (UTC)There was actually a fascinating exhibition of 'ex Crown Jewels' - which I didn't think would photograph very well. It was the various crowns made for various kings and queens, from which the jewels had been removed to put them into other crowns as fashions changed - and actually when reduced to just goldwork and velvet I thought some of them were prettier than the ones with the jewels actually in them at the moment.
no subject
Date: 19/04/2006 10:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 19/04/2006 10:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 19/04/2006 10:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 19/04/2006 10:39 pm (UTC)Thank you for the compliment on the photography! Completely unrelated to your comment - but the more I look at The Gherkin the more it looks like a giant glass dildo...!!
no subject
Date: 20/04/2006 11:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 19/04/2006 11:19 pm (UTC)Your description of Henry VIII armor makes me snicker! That cannon is very cool though-- I see what you mean about disk-world!
no subject
Date: 20/04/2006 07:47 am (UTC)And the cannon was just SO Discworld!
no subject
Date: 20/04/2006 08:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 20/04/2006 12:55 am (UTC)Dang, I really must go back to London some day and see all the stuff I missed the first two times. (Which is basically everything *I* wanted to see. Comes of traveling with other folks who don't have huge history-laden obsessive agendas.)
I did spend lots of time in Leeds, however, and yes, the Royal Armouries are definitely worth a visit! For a Highlander fan, the swords alone were a revelation! LOL!
no subject
Date: 20/04/2006 07:51 am (UTC)Some of those claymores are great, and you'd need to bo pretty tall to handle some of the two-handed swords.
no subject
Date: 20/04/2006 02:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 20/04/2006 07:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 20/04/2006 05:57 am (UTC)London does great tourist stuff!! LOL! It's great unless you work up there which I did for many years - then you hate the tourists!
no subject
Date: 20/04/2006 07:55 am (UTC)I think of London as a place to visit - rarely!
no subject
Date: 20/04/2006 10:25 am (UTC)Me too. It's a place for young people. The Daughter was born in South London and, despite moving to the wilds of Hertfordshire when she was 8, she considers herself a Londoner and has never left it since leaving home to go to Imperial College.
Love the obligatory pic of Tower Bridge. The poor Yanks thought they were getting that when we sold them Tower Bridge. Have you ever seen Tower Bridge in action? When I took my German nephew-in-law on 'the tour' many years ago, he got a photo of a sailing ship passing beneath the opening bridge.
no subject
Date: 20/04/2006 12:26 pm (UTC)I really, really wouldn't want to live in London - and my daughter agrees, at least at the moment, even though she's got a couple of friends who are desperate to move there.
no subject
Date: 20/04/2006 12:48 pm (UTC)It's so easy to overlook all the "touristy" things, isn't it? Only last year we realised we'd not taken the girls to the British Museum since we were using buggies to transport them, so we went on a trip. They fell in love with the place.
no subject
Date: 20/04/2006 06:01 pm (UTC)Actually in the end we didn't make it to the British Museum - I know, sacrilage!
no subject
Date: 21/04/2006 12:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 20/04/2006 02:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 20/04/2006 06:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 20/04/2006 04:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 20/04/2006 06:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 20/04/2006 08:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 20/04/2006 04:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 20/04/2006 06:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 20/04/2006 05:05 pm (UTC)Delighted to see that you enjoyed your trip and are now safely home. From reading his posts I had the feeling that S2C was rattling around the home front.
Hate to say this but I had the WTF moment when I saw that glass tower thing and it was only magnified when I saw the name. Did London decide that it just had to have a more phallic building than Paris?
By the way, did you see that Xander the Wombat has gone missing? A fan (obviously) in Oregon reported the disappearance this week. Willow the Wombat . . . along with Ethel the Aardvark remained safely at home.
I'm joking about Ethel, it just seemed so natural to mention her there. Now if I could get the picture of Juliet Landau having tea with an aardvark out of my head I'd be a happy man.
Although I bet either you or S2C could write a ficlet about that and it would make sense.
I saw a post over at Whedonesque where the actress who played the much maligned, perhaps unfairly so, Kennedy has come out of the closet. Apparently her love scenes with AH got her wondering about her sexuality.
Can't you just see Hannigan reading this and saying "Damn, I'm good."
Is the Hugh Laurie show 'House' showing where you're at? Michelle T. was just a guest star on a recent episode and did a very convincing job of playing a . . . whiny, resentful sixteen year old who managed to get in a life threatening situation. And it aired on Tuesday night no less. Sad to say it was her most convincing performance I've seen in a while. Missed her theatrical movies but saw her in a made for tv thing where she was trying to play a twenty something who abandons the fiance she no longer loves after he is crippled. The character was uninteresting and love scenes with her and an older actor were kinda creepy. She's over twenty but really hasn't changed all that much.
Take care and enjoy settling in. I'd wish you a nice cup of tea but I'm afraid I share Colin Mochrie's attitude toward the drink.
pgavigan
no subject
Date: 20/04/2006 05:59 pm (UTC)We do have House - I find it a bit difficult to take Hugh Laurie seriously, having sat through innumerable series of Blackadder when our daughter discovered it! I have seen some episodes, but not the MT one - I think we might be a series, or half a series or something, behind the US here though, so I'll look out for it anyway.
I'm not big on tea myself - although we did have afternoon tea at Selfridges whilst in London.
no subject
Date: 21/04/2006 07:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 08/05/2007 05:18 pm (UTC)The armor is quite impressive. I cannot imagine keeping oneself astride a galloping horse when wearing that much heavy metal. Oof. It's no wonder they were such strong men.
I took a pic of that cannon, and of the Roman wall behind it as well. It's really something to see such ancient items out in the open air; one worries that they will be irreparably damaged over time.
Thanks so much for pointing me at your wonderful pics. :)
no subject
Date: 08/05/2007 05:34 pm (UTC)one worries that they will be irreparably damaged over time.
Wouldn't worry about them too much - they've survived pretty well so far, and will be taken good care of. Hadrian's wall is still looking pretty good and it's almost 2,000 years old! Actually I have some good pictures of Hadrian's wall - I must post them sometime.
If you want to see the rest of the pics we took in London, they are all tagged as 'London'.